![]() Standards for toughening need to be developed. "Toughened" glassware had lower impact resistance. Glass with lower impact resistance caused more injuries. Impact resistance testing showed the energy required to break annealed glass (1.8 +/- 0.2 J) was greater than that for toughened glass (1.4 +/- 0.2 J), though the difference was not significant. Injuries tended to occur simultaneously in more than one body part in the intervention group, reportedly caused by spontaneous disintegration of toughened glassware. Most were hand injuries requiring first aid. Thus, injury rate was 60% higher in the intervention group (p<0.05), with no significant difference in severity. Similarly, adjusting for hours worked gave RR 1.57 (CI 1.08 to 2.29). Adjusting for people at risk gave a relative risk (RR) of 1.48 (confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 2.15). Ninety eight bar staff experienced 115 injuries: 43 in the control group, 72 in the intervention group. To evaluate the effectiveness, in terms of injury prevention, of toughened pint glassware in bars.Ī random sample of 57 bars in South Wales, West Midlands, and West of England.Ĭomplete replacement of pint glasses with annealed (control) or toughened (intervention) glassware.īar staff injuries recorded monthly: number, site, and severity (lifestyle impact treatment need) of injuries. Those who were kicked were most likely to need hospital admission. Only 6% of victims reported injury with knives but 11% were injured by broken drinking glasses. Injury most often resulted from punching (72% of assaults) or kicking (42% of assaults). Overall, the type of injury observed correlated with the alleged weapon used ( P=<0.001) though 20% of victims who reported attacks with sharp weapons sustained only haematomas or fractures. Seventeen per cent of victims required hospital admission. Twenty-six per cent of victims sustained at least one fracture and nasal fractures were the most fiequently observed skeletal injuries (27%) followed by-zygomatic fractures (22%) and mandibular body (12%), angle (12%) and condyle (9%) fractures. The upper limb was the next most common site of injury (14% of all injuries). In a prospective study, all 539 adult victims of assault attending a major city centre Accident & Emergency department in 1986 were therefore interviewed and examined.įacial injury was extremely common: 83% of all fractures, 66% of all lacerations and 53% of all haematomas were facial. Conclusions/importance: Observation and use of illicit drugs are common among employees in the Stockholm nightlife setting and has increased significantly during the past decade.Īlthough the incidence of assault and other violent crime is increasing in the UK, the cause and overall pattern of injury, and the need for admission have not been defined in adult victims who attend hospital. ![]() Almost half of the respondents in the youngest age group (18–24 years) reported illicit drug use during the last year. Furthermore, comparisons with previous time-points showed a significant increase in the proportion of employees using illicit drugs. The belief that one had observed patrons intoxicated by illicit drugs was more common among respondents who had themselves been using illicit drugs during the last year, and also among employees at nightclubs. Results: A majority of the respondents reported having observed patrons intoxicated by illicit drugs in the last six months, and agreed that patrons intoxicated by illicit drugs should be asked to leave licensed premises. ![]() A total of 665 persons (mean age 28 years, 53% women) were included in the 2016/2017 measurement. Methods: Cross-sectional surveys were conducted at three time-points: 2001, 2007/08, and 2016/17, comprising employees at licensed premises in Stockholm participating in STAD’s Responsible Beverage Service training program. Also, to make comparisons with two identical measurements from 20/08, and to explore potential differences related to own drug use, type of licensed premise, age or gender. Purpose/objectives: To assess perceived prevalence of illicit drug use in the Stockholm nightlife setting, use of and attitudes toward illicit drugs among employees at licensed premises. Illicit drug use is common in nightlife settings and associated with various public health-related problems, making this an important arena for prevention.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |